On 9/15/15 11:45 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> AFAICT from a quick look at its documentation, asciidoc can produce >> either html or docbook output; so as soon as you want something other >> than html output (in particular, PDF), you're back to relying on the >> exact same creaky docbook toolchain we use now. Only with one extra >> dependency in front of it. >> >> Personally I never look at anything but the HTML rendering, but I doubt >> that dropping support for all other output formats would fly :-( > > Just out of curiosity, really?
Man pages are in wide use, I think. > I mean, I can't see that building a PDF of the documentation really > has much value, and I don't know even what else we can build. Who in > 2015 would use a PDF instead of HTML? PDF is actually kind of neat for searches across the whole document. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
