Hi, On 2015-09-17 16:32:17 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > In walsender.c, walreceiver.c, walreceiverfuncs.c there are several > places where volatile qualifiers are used apparently only to prevent > reordering around spinlock operations. My understanding is that if > potential load/store reordering around spinlock operations is the only > reason for using volatile, 0709b7ee72e4bc71ad07b7120acd117265ab51d0 > made it unnecessary. For example see > 6ba4ecbf477e0b25dd7bde1b0c4e07fc2da19348 which stripped some volatile > qualifiers out of xlog.c.
Same in bufmgr.c et al. There it's actually rather annoying for new code because volatile needs to be casted away in a bunch of places... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers