On 2015-09-23 15:57:02 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I think we need to make a decision here. Is this a terribly serious > bug/misdesign that needs addressing?
Imo yes. Not sure about terribly, but definitely serious. It's several data loss bugs in one package. > If so, we need to backpatch. If not, then by all means lets leave it > alone. I don't think it is a good idea to leave it open if we think > it's serious, which is what I think is happening. Right, but I don't want to backpatch this over an objection, and it doesn't seem like I have a chance to convince Robert that it'd be a good idea. So it'll be 9.5+master for now. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
