Hi While studying lmgr code, I noticed that there are a couple of places that use 1 << x to convert a LOCKMODE to a LOCKMASK instead of the macro that is used elsewhere. Should that be changed for consistency, as in the attached?
-- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
use-lockbit-on-macro.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
