On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Steve Crawford < scrawf...@pinpointresearch.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:16 AM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > >> ...What we're not fine with is depending on a proprietary system, no >> matter what type of license, as infrastructure... >> >> > Exactly. Which is why I was warning about latching onto features only > available in the closed enterprise version. > > Cheers, > Steve > > If we have consensus of what we want, why not just hire some company to develop it for us ? I'm sure we could find such a company in Russia and even would sponsor postgres community and pay for the development. There are other postgres companies, which may join us. Or better, pay through pg foundation.
