On 2015-10-14 16:17:55 +0300, Amir Rohan wrote: > it does fail the "dependent options" test: > $ postgres -C "archive_mode" > on > $ postgres -C wal_level > minimal
Yea, because that's currently evaluated outside the config mechanism. It'd imo would be good to change that independent of this thread. > 5) Because it checks syntax only, you don't get the benefits of having > an official place for the community to easily contribute rules that > warn you against config pitfalls, so that all users benefits. > See my OP for real-world examples and links about this problem. I don't think we as a community want to do that without review mechanisms in place, and I personally don't think we want to add separate processes for this. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
