On 10/14/2015 05:35 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-10-14 16:50:41 +0300, Amir Rohan wrote: >>> I don't think we as a community want to do that without review >>> mechanisms in place, and I personally don't think we want to add >>> separate processes for this. >>> >> >> That's what "contribute" means in my book. > > Then your argument about the CF process doesn't seem to make sense. >
Why? I ask again, what do you mean by "separate process"? either it's in core (and follows its processes) or it isn't. But you can't say you don't want it in core but that you also don't want it to follow a "separate process". I think you're simply saying you're -1 on the whole idea. ok. Regards, Amir -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
