On 14 October 2015 at 04:01, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This patch is marked as Ready for Committer in the CommitFest
> application.  Here is my attempt to summarize the votes upthread:
>
> Tom Lane: plpgsql RAISE is sufficient; we don't need this.
> Pavel Stehule: could be replaced by custom function, but not against it.
> Robert Haas: plpgsql RAISE is sufficient; we don't need this.
> Jim Nasby: A generic wrapper around RAISE is not trivial, so +1.
> Andres Freund: I've written this function many times, so let's have it in 
> core.
> David Fetter: I've written this function like 20 times, we should have it.

Not a committer, so I don't really get a vote here, but I think it's
useful and I've written a "RAISE" wrapper in plpgsql enough times to
think it's useful. I've used it for tracing progress of queries, for
aborting queries on error conditions, all sorts of things.

-1 for any attempt to bypass log_min_messages etc. If we were going to
go there we should do it with proper heirachical logging control, not
a special case half measure.

-- 
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to