On 15-10-2015 05:41, kolo hhmow wrote:
I have already explained this in my previous post. Did you read this?
> Yes, I do.
So why postgresql give users an abbility to use a pam modules, when in other side there is advice to not use them? Anyway.
> Where is such advise? I can't see it in docs [1].
I do not see any complication with this approach. Just use one configuration entry in pg_hba.conf, and rest entries in some database backend of pam module, which is most convenient with lot of entries than editing pg_hba.conf.
Why don't you use a group role? I need just one entry in pg_hba.conf. [1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/auth-methods.html#AUTH-PAM [2] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/role-membership.html -- Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
