Robert Haas wrote: > I think some more interesting questions are: > - Did he implement this correctly? > - Would it break anything? > - Are there lots of other knobs we should expose too instead of just one? > - What would it take to turn this into a committable patch? > - Would the cost of exposing this and perhaps some other knobs cost > too much in performance for the number of people it would make happy? > - If so, should the behavior be GUC-controlled or is there > justification for arguing we should drop the whole patch?
I agree with this set of questions -- the idea behind the patch seemed quite reasonable to me. > I feel like we've got somebody new showing up to our community with an > idea that is not obviously stupid. If we want such people to stick > around, we should try to give their ideas a fair shake. +1 to this, too. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
