Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Refresh my memory: what is the point of inventing an additional LAST
>> keyword, when the behavior is exactly the same as MOVE ALL ?
> SQL compatibility, per Peter.
Oh, I see. But then really it should be documented as a FETCH keyword,
not only a MOVE keyword. Will fix.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
