Tom Lane wrote: > > Sure. FETCH n in Postgres has always corresponded to FETCH RELATIVE n. IIRC in SQL standard FETCH retrieves rows one by one. regards, Hiroshi Inoue http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
- [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue