On 9/2/15 4:19 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > maybe - but having a fixed "default" is very different from baking a > classic unix permission concept of user/group/world^others into actual > DDL or into a COPY option. The proposed syntax might make some sense to > a admin used to a unix style system but it is likely utterly > incomprehensible to somebody who is used to (windows style) ACLs. > > I dont have a good answer on what to do else atm but I dont think we > should embedded traditional/historical unix permission models in our > grammer unless really really needed...
The user can just create a directory with appropriate permissions and copy the files there. I don't really see why COPY needs to know about all this. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
