On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 9/2/15 4:19 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >> maybe - but having a fixed "default" is very different from baking a >> classic unix permission concept of user/group/world^others into actual >> DDL or into a COPY option. The proposed syntax might make some sense to >> a admin used to a unix style system but it is likely utterly >> incomprehensible to somebody who is used to (windows style) ACLs. >> >> I dont have a good answer on what to do else atm but I dont think we >> should embedded traditional/historical unix permission models in our >> grammer unless really really needed... > > The user can just create a directory with appropriate permissions and > copy the files there. I don't really see why COPY needs to know about > all this.
In short, it seems that this patch is better rejected. And I am planning to do so if there are no complaints. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
