On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 08:53:07AM +0000, Dave Page wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 06:40:09PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> > >> > Do we still have licensing issues if we ship Postgres and OpenSSL > >> > together? > >> > >> See > >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150801151410.GA28344%40awork2.anarazel.de > > > > True, but the current license is unchanged and has the advertising > > clause, which I think we have to honor if we ship OpenSSL: > > > > https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html > > > > I assume Windows has to ship OpenSSL with the installer and has to abide > > by this, for example. OSX might have to do the same. It might be good > > to see what we do for Windows packages. > > We already do it for all our installers - Windows, OSX and Linux. We > have to, otherwise we wouldn't be able to ensure the same binaries > would run on all the different supported versions.
OK, good. So the Mac installers would have to do the same thing if they also start shipping OpenSSL too. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
