On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 08:53:07AM +0000, Dave Page wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 06:40:09PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >> >> >> > Do we still have licensing issues if we ship Postgres and OpenSSL >> >> > together? >> >> >> >> See >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150801151410.GA28344%40awork2.anarazel.de >> > >> > True, but the current license is unchanged and has the advertising >> > clause, which I think we have to honor if we ship OpenSSL: >> > >> > https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html >> > >> > I assume Windows has to ship OpenSSL with the installer and has to abide >> > by this, for example. OSX might have to do the same. It might be good >> > to see what we do for Windows packages. >> >> We already do it for all our installers - Windows, OSX and Linux. We >> have to, otherwise we wouldn't be able to ensure the same binaries >> would run on all the different supported versions. > > OK, good. So the Mac installers would have to do the same thing if they > also start shipping OpenSSL too.
OSX == Mac. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
