Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 1 December 2015 at 17:05, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> do we want to
>> back-patch those changes to 9.5 at this late date?
> Surely the whole point of a release process is to fix issues in the
> release. If we don't ever dare put something in the release, we may as well
> have released it earlier.
> I'm thinking about a two stage release process...
> Stage 1 - released, but with caveats and some parts marked
> experimental/beta whatever
> Stage 2 - released, all caveats resolved
> Not sure what to call that.
9.5beta3. If you're saying we are not ready for an RC, then it's a beta.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
