On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, the machine we called "ninefivealpha", which incidentally, failed to > find a single bug in alpha2 thru beta2, is currently idle, and concurrent > index creation times are a bugbear around these parts. Can somebody, either > in this thread or privately, outline what sort of a test they'd like to see?
Any kind of CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY test, before and after. I looked at a simple, random int4 column. That seems like a good case to focus on, since there isn't too much other overhead. I think I performed my test on an unlogged table, to make sure other overhead was even further minimized. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers