On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:17 PM, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 17 December 2015 at 19:11, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> On 17 December 2015 at 00:17, Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> I'd go with match_first_tuple_only. >> >> >> +1 >> >> unique_inner is a state that has been detected, match_first_tuple_only is >> the action we take as a result. >> > > Ok great. I've made it so in the attached. This means the comment in the > join code where we perform the skip can be a bit less verbose and all the > details can go in where we're actually setting the match_first_tuple_only to > true.
Patch moved to next CF because of a lack of reviews on the new patch, and because the last patch has been posted not so long ago. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
