On 1/6/16 5:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Having said that, it occurs to me that one way to contribute without
actually writing C code would be to try to drive those unfinished
discussions to consensus, and come up with specs for features that people
agree are well-thought-out. Conversely, establishing a consensus that a
proposal is a bad idea and it should go away from the list would be a
useful activity.
+1.
Somewhat related to that, I don't believe there's any reason why commit
fest managers need to be committers; it seems like the job is really
just about reading through email activity to see where things are at.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
