On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> > >> There are quite a few contributing companies that likely have people > that > >> could help out with this in an educated fashion but aren't coders. > > > Sort of like how they could also have helped out with cf management? > > Dunno about that. While a CF manager doesn't necessarily have to have > a commit bit, I think he/she probably does have to be someone who is known > and respected on the -hackers list. Otherwise, nagging to finish patches > is likely to be ignored or even counterproductive. >
I realize now that I caught JDs response slightly out of context. I thought we were talking issue/bugtracker, in which case I think that is needed just as much as it is for a CF manager. As it's basically the same thing just at a different stage. But that one seems to be more about keeping the todo list on the wiki up to date, in which case I agree, not as much is needed. Because it's more reflecting what's happened, rather than trying to manage process. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
