On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Another tool that we had better IMO put some efforts in porting > into core is sqlsmith, which would actually be a complete rewrite > because the upstream code is under GPL license and depends on libpqxx.
Then Andreas Seltenreich better get a commit bit. I've seen him turn around changes in sqlsmith to test new areas of Postgres in a couple of days. That's a big reason why he has been so effective. What benefit does porting sqlsmith for inclusion in core have? I can only think of costs, including those that you mentioned. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
