On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Another tool that we had better IMO put some efforts in porting >> into core is sqlsmith, which would actually be a complete rewrite >> because the upstream code is under GPL license and depends on libpqxx. > > Then Andreas Seltenreich better get a commit bit. I've seen him turn > around changes in sqlsmith to test new areas of Postgres in a couple > of days. That's a big reason why he has been so effective. > > What benefit does porting sqlsmith for inclusion in core have? I can > only think of costs, including those that you mentioned.
We have automatic buildfarm coverage on many platforms. Perhaps we could live without that with a buildfarm module though. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
