On 2016-01-25 13:36:04 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > We still have 41 patches that haven't gotten enough review though. The > bad part about it is that there's a number of patches that have been > bouncing for many commitfests now. Here's a list of the patches with > the most such actions (both in Needs Review and Ready for Committer > state):
> * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/260/ > checkpoint continuous flushing FWIW, I've been working and benchmarking this a lot over the last weeks. After finally nailing down the performance regression due to wal writer, thins are looking good. I plan to post an updated version soon. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
