Andres Freund wrote: > On 2016-01-25 13:36:04 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > We still have 41 patches that haven't gotten enough review though. The > > bad part about it is that there's a number of patches that have been > > bouncing for many commitfests now. Here's a list of the patches with > > the most such actions (both in Needs Review and Ready for Committer > > state): > > > * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/260/ > > checkpoint continuous flushing > > FWIW, I've been working and benchmarking this a lot over the last > weeks. After finally nailing down the performance regression due to wal > writer, thins are looking good. I plan to post an updated version soon.
Excellent. I assume the walwriter bug is going to get fixed separately, probably backpatched too? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
