On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 1/26/16 10:56 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: >> What we should do is >> 1. Map "archive" and "hot_standby" to one level with a new name that >> indicates that it can be used for both/either backup or replication. >> (My suggested name for the new level is "replica"...) > > I have been leaning toward making up a new name, too, but hadn't found a > good one. I tend to like "replica", though.
"replica" sounds nice. >> 2. Deprecate "archive" and "hot_standby" so that those will be removed >> in a later release. > > If we do 1, then we might as well get rid of the old names right away. +1. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
