> > > > Do you have any insight as to why the documentation test failed? > > > > In the mean time, here's the updated patch. > > I didn't pass the docs on account of the wonky comment since I consider > code comments to be part of the docs. The sgml docs build fine and look > good to me. > > Ah, understood. I rebuilt the docs thinking there was a make check failure I missed, then viewed the html in links (I develop on an AWS box) and saw nothing untoward.
> I'll retest and update the review accordingly. > Thanks!
