On 2016-02-02 13:12:50 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > On 2016-02-01 13:06:57 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Alexander Korotkov < > > > a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > > >> Client Base Patch > > > >> 1 19744 19382 > > > >> 8 125923 126395 > > > >> 32 313931 333351 > > > >> 64 387339 496830 > > > >> 128 306412 350610 > > > >> > > > >> Shared Buffer= 512MB > > > >> max_connections=150 > > > >> Scale Factor=300 > > > >> > > > >> ./pgbench -j$ -c$ -T300 -M prepared -S postgres > > > >> > > > >> Client Base Patch > > > >> 1 17169 16454 > > > >> 8 108547 105559 > > > >> 32 241619 262818 > > > >> 64 206868 233606 > > > >> 128 137084 217013 > > > > So, there's a small regression on low client counts. That's worth > > addressing. > > > > Interesting. I'll try to reproduce it.
Any progress here? Regards, Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
