On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> And this latest result (no regression) is on X86 but on my local machine. >> >> I did not exactly saw what this new version of patch is doing different, >> so I will test this version in other machines also and see the results. > > > I tested this on PPC again, This time in various order (sometime patch first > and then base first). > I tested with latest patch pinunpin-cas-2.patch on Power8. > > Shared Buffer = 8GB > ./pgbench -j$ -c$ -T300 -M prepared -S postgres > > BASE > ----- > Clients run1 run2 run3 > 1 21200 18754 20537 > 2 40331 39520 38746 > > > Patch > ----- > Clients run1 run2 run3 > 1 20225 19806 19778 > 2 39830 41898 36620 > > I think, here we can not see any regression, (If I take median then it may > looks low with patch so posting all 3 reading).
If the median looks low, how is that not a regression? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
