On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: >> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> I'd suggest we either name it based on the current tentative >>> date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or >>> something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it >>> more clear. >> >> +1 to both names suggested by Magnus. > > We do need to pick one of them :) > > Anybody else with preferences? I would prefer to see a consistent namimg pattern (i.e., 2016-09) and rename it if we reschedule. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
