On 3/1/16 3:35 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 
>>>> I'd suggest we either name it based on the current tentative
>>>> date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or
>>>> something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it
>>>> more clear.
>>>
>>> +1 to both names suggested by Magnus.
>>
>> We do need to pick one of them :)
>>
>> Anybody else with preferences?
> 
> I would prefer to see a consistent namimg pattern (i.e., 2016-09)
> and rename it if we reschedule.

I'm fine with that - it does help set expectations.

-- 
-David
da...@pgmasters.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to