On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Bert <bier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you for the performance test. But please not that the patch is 'thrown > away', and will be totally rewritten. I have no idea of the status of the > second / third attempt however. > However, what is interesting is that for some queries this patch is already > on par with VCI. Which db is that exactly?
The performance report is taken on the patch that is WIP columnar storage on PostgreSQL database. Only the storage part of the code is finished. To test the performance, we used custom plan to generate the plans where it can use the columnar storage. This way we ran the performance test. I want to integrate this patch with syntax proposed by Alvaro for columnar storage and share it with community, before that i want to share the current storage design with the community for review by preparing some readme file. I will try to send this soon. Regards, Hari Babu Fujitsu Australia -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
