Haribabu Kommi wrote: > The performance report is taken on the patch that is WIP columnar storage > on PostgreSQL database. Only the storage part of the code is finished. > To test the performance, we used custom plan to generate the plans > where it can use the columnar storage. This way we ran the performance > test.
Quickly eyeballing your results I think they are similar to ours: there are some performance gains but nothing spectacular. That's why I want to take another, more invasive approach that buys us more. The wiki page I'm to write will describe our rough plan for that. Your input on that will be appreciated. > I want to integrate this patch with syntax proposed by Alvaro for columnar > storage and share it with community, before that i want to share the current > storage design with the community for review by preparing some readme > file. I will try to send this soon. Please do, thanks. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
