On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > At Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:30:17 -0500, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote > in <ca+tgmoafgr2j90rgif_is8kj_7bb5xaxnpwyct2578cyddu...@mail.gmail.com> >> >>> I committed this and back-patched this but (1) I avoided changing the >> >>> other functions for now and (2) I gave both the byte length and the >> >>> character length new names to avoid confusion. >> >> >> >> These tweaks appear to have been universally disliked by buildfarm >> >> members. >> > >> > Crap. Wasn't careful enough, sorry. Will fix shortly. >> >> Fix pushed. > > Thank you for committing this. I can see only one commit for this > in the repository but I believe it is the fixed one.
It was OK in master, but the back-branches had problems. See 369c0b09080812943a2efcebe91cf4b271bc4f86. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
