On 03/07/2016 01:43 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
All,
http://blogs.microsoft.com/?p=67248
Once SQL Server is available on Linux, we're going to see more people
using it as an alternative to PostgreSQL. Especially since they're
picking up a lot of our better features, like R support.
Yes but:
1. MSSQL is not going to magically run well on Linux. It was never
designed to run on a *NIX platform and it long left the parts that would
(Sybase) in the dust.
2. This is actually good for us. It validates our primary deployment
platform. Why run a closed source MSSQL when you can get Open Source
PostgreSQL on the same platform major platform?
3. Competition is good when we have it, our community steps up.
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
