Andres Freund wrote: > I do wonder if adding a PGCTLPOSTGRESWRAPPER or something to pg_ctl > would be ok. That'd just supplant calling the postgres binary, making > all this easier.
This seems a reasonably principled way to go about this. Eventually we might plug other things in it ... -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
