On 2016-03-08 18:24:23 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andres Freund wrote: > > > I do wonder if adding a PGCTLPOSTGRESWRAPPER or something to pg_ctl > > would be ok. That'd just supplant calling the postgres binary, making > > all this easier. > > This seems a reasonably principled way to go about this. Eventually we > might plug other things in it ...
It's not that easy to write such a wrapper though - you *have* to exec the final binary, because -w assumes that the child pid is going to appear in postmaster.pid... To be actually useful we kinda would have to backpatch this to 9.4 (where the valgrind hardening stuff started)... Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
