Robert Haas wrote: > Let's yank 'em. This is a minor issue which is distracting us from > the main point of this patch, and I don't think it's worth getting > distracted.
+1 > I'm pretty meh about the whole idea of this function, though, > actually, and I don't see a single clear +1 vote for this > functionality upthread. (Apologies if I've missed one.) In the > absence of a few of those, I recommend we reject this. +1 -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
