On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 10 March 2016 at 06:53, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> > Robert Haas wrote: >> >> I'm pretty meh about the whole idea of this function, though, >> >> actually, and I don't see a single clear +1 vote for this >> >> functionality upthread. (Apologies if I've missed one.) In the >> >> absence of a few of those, I recommend we reject this. >> > >> > +1 >> >> I'm meh for this patch. > > > "meh" == +1 > > I thought it meant -1
In my case it meant, like, -0.5. I don't really like adding lots of utility functions like this to the default install, because I'm not sure how widely they get used and it gradually increases the size of the code, system catalogs, etc. But I also don't want to block genuinely useful things. So basically, I'm not excited about this patch, but I don't want to fight about it either. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
