> > > So presently partitions that are unbounded on the lower end aren't > > possible, but that's a creation syntax issue, not an infrastructure > issue. > > Correct? > > In case it wasn't apparent, you can create those: > > FOR VALUES END (upper-bound) [INCLUSIVE] > > which is equivalent to: > > FOR VALUES '(, upper-bound)' or FOR VALUES '(, upper-bound]' > > Thanks for clarifying. My BNF-fu is weak.
> >
