On 10 March 2016 at 00:41, Igal @ Lucee.org <i...@lucee.org> wrote: > On 3/8/2016 5:12 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: > >> One of the worst problems (IMO) is in the driver architecture its self. >> It attempts to prevent blocking by guestimating the server's send buffer >> state and its recv buffer state, trying to stop them filling and causing >> the server to block on writes. It should just avoid blocking on its own >> send buffer, which it can control with confidence. Or use some of Java's >> rather good concurrency/threading features to simultaneously consume data >> from the receive buffer and write to the send buffer when needed, like >> pgjdbc-ng does. >> > > Are there good reasons to use pgjdbc over pgjdbc-ng then? > > Maturity, support for older versions (-ng just punts on support for anything except new releases) and older JDBC specs, completeness of support for some extensions. TBH I haven't done a ton with -ng yet.
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
