On 4/3/2016 8:21 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:
On 9 March 2016 at 20:49, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com
<mailto:cr...@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
On 3/8/2016 5:12 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Are there good reasons to use pgjdbc over pgjdbc-ng then?
Maturity, support for older versions (-ng just punts on support
for anything except new releases) and older JDBC specs,
completeness of support for some extensions. TBH I haven't done a
ton with -ng yet.
I'd like to turn this question around. Are there good reasons to use
-ng over pgjdbc ?
As to your question, you may be interested to know that pgjdbc is more
performant than ng.
That's good to know, but unfortunately pgjdbc is unusable for us until
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/488 is fixed.
Also, as I mentioned in the ticket, I can't imagine RETURNING * being
performant if, for example, I INSERT a large chunk of data like an image
data or an uploaded file.
Igal
