On 3/10/16 9:51 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > The patch is evidently modeled on errhidestmt and errhidectx, which are > making the same assumption for their fields. > > I wonder whether, instead of continuing to proliferate random bool fields > in struct ErrorData, we oughta replace them all with an "int flags" field. > That's probably material for a separate patch though.
There are currently six boolean flags (if you include my new one) that all relate to visibility in one way or another. Combining them into a "flags" field makes sense to me. I'll submit a proposal to hackers after 9.6 to make this change. -- -David da...@pgmasters.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
