David Steele wrote: > On 3/29/16 10:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >Repurposing COMMERROR is definitely starting to seem like a low-impact > >solution compared to these others. Under what circumstances would you > >be wanting hide-from-client with an elevel different from LOG, anyway? > > In pgaudit the log level for audit messages is user configurable but this > was mostly added for testing purposes on the client side. I don't think it > would be a big deal to force the level to LOG when client output is > suppressed.
So audit records would use COMMERROR? That sounds really bad to me. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
