Hi Abhijit,
On 3/1/16 8:36 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
On 2/29/16 10:33 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
>Given the audience for this, I think it'd probably be OK to just
>provide a function that does this, instead of DDL.
That seems like a promising idea. Can you suggest some possible usage?
pg_extension_dependency( regextension, any )
where "any" would be all the other reg* types. That should be a lot less
work to code up than messing with the grammar.
So where are we on this now? Were you going to implement this as a
function the way Jim suggested?
Alexander, you are signed up to review. Any opinion on which course is
best?
Thanks,
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
