On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > At 2016-03-21 13:04:33 +0300, a.korot...@postgrespro.ru wrote: >> >> I'm not sure why we want to make new dependency type by ALTER FUNCTION >> command, not ALTER EXTENSION? > > It's a matter of semantics. It means something very different than what > an 'e' dependency means. The extension doesn't own the function (and so > pg_dump shouldn't ignore it), but the function depends on the extension > (and so dropping the extension should drop it).
Yeah, I think this is definitely an ALTER FUNCTION kind of thing, not an ALTER EXTENSION kind of thing. I also think we should allow a function to depend on multiple extensions, as Alvaro mentions downthread. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
