Hi,
On 03/13/2016 10:44 PM, David Rowley wrote:
On 12 March 2016 at 16:31, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
I've attached an updated patch which is based on commit 7087166,
things are really changing fast in the grouping path area at the
moment, but hopefully the dust is starting to settle now.
The attached patch fixes a harmless compiler warning about a
possible uninitialised variable.
I've looked at this patch today. The patch seems quite solid, but I do
have a few minor comments (or perhaps questions, given that this is the
first time I looked at the patch).
1) exprCollation contains this bit:
-----------------------------------
case T_PartialAggref:
coll = InvalidOid; /* XXX is this correct? */
break;
I doubt this is the right thing to do. Can we actually get to this piece
of code? I haven't tried too hard, but regression tests don't seem to
trigger this piece of code.
Moreover, if we're handling PartialAggref in exprCollation(), maybe we
should handle it also in exprInputCollation and exprSetCollation?
And if we really need the collation there, why not to fetch the actual
collation from the nested Aggref? Why should it be InvalidOid?
2) partial_aggregate_walker
---------------------------
I think this should follow the naming convention that clearly identifies
the purpose of the walker, not what kind of nodes it is supposed to
walk. So it should be:
aggregates_allow_partial_walker
3) create_parallelagg_path
--------------------------
I do agree with the logic that under-estimates are more dangerous than
over-estimates, so the current estimate is safer. But I think this would
be a good place to apply the formula I proposed a few days ago (or
rather the one Dean Rasheed proposed in response).
That is, we do know that there are numGroups in total, and each parallel
worker sees subpath->rows then it's expected to see
sel = (subpath->rows / rel->tuples);
perGroup = (rel->tuples / numGroups);
workerGroups = numGroups * (1 - powl(1 - s, perGroup));
numPartialGroups = numWorkers * workerGroups
It's probably better to see Dean's message from 13/3.
4) Is clauses.h the right place for PartialAggType?
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
