On 15.03.2016 17:28, David Steele wrote:
On 3/14/16 12:27 PM, Artur Zakirov wrote:
On 14.03.2016 18:48, David Steele wrote:
Hi Jeff,
On 2/25/16 5:00 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
But, It doesn't sound like I am going to win that debate. Given that,
I don't think we need a different name for the function. I'm fine with
explaining the word-boundary subtlety in the documentation, and
keeping the function name itself simple.
It's not clear to me if you are requesting more documentation here or
stating that you are happy with it as-is. Care to elaborate?
Other than that I think this patch looks to be ready for committer. Any
objections?
There was some comments about the word-boundary subtlety. But I think it
was not enough.
I rephrased the explanation of word_similarity() and %>. It is better now.
But if it is not correct I can change the explanation.
Since to only change in the latest patch is to documentation I have
marked this "ready for committer".
Thank you!
--
Artur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
