On 2016-03-29 12:58:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Looking back at the earlier thread Andres mentioned, I see that he was > specifically on about being able to do ereport(ERROR | LOG_NO_CLIENT), > which I've got a problem with because of the point about not breaking > wire-protocol expectations.
Yes. The reason for doing it in that case is that we weren't allowed to send errors to the client in that specific case - by the protocol state. There's a number of cases during early startup/auth where we really don't want client to get messages. > and it doesn't look like he thought about the elevel-comparisons > issue either. Nope, I didn't. That's a long while ago ;) Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
