Andres Freund wrote: > On 2016-03-31 10:15:21 +0900, Ian Barwick wrote: > > Patch changes the error message to: > > > > ERROR: replication slots can only be used if wal_level is "replica" or > > "logical" > > > > Explicitly naming the valid WAL levels matches the wording in the wal_level > > error hint used in a couple of places, i.e. > > The explicit naming makes it much more verbose to change anything around > wal level though, so consider me not a fan of spelling out all levels.
I thought we had agreed that we weren't going to consider the wal_level values as a linear scale -- in other words, wordings such as "greater than FOO" are discouraged. That's always seemed a bit odd to me. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
